DataArt
New York software engineering firm founded in 1997
What is DataArt?
DataArt goes back to 1997, founded by Eugene Goland, and is headquartered in New York City with roughly 5,700 employees spread across more than 30 locations in the US, Europe, the UK, Latin America, and the UAE. The firm delivers data, analytics, and AI platforms for finance, media and entertainment, healthcare and life sciences, retail, and travel and hospitality clients. Nearly three decades of history gives it a longer track record than almost every other firm here, though AI is delivered as part of a broader software engineering practice rather than a standalone specialty.
DataArt works primarily with clients in Financial services, Healthcare, Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality sectors. Its primary differentiator is: Nearly 30 years of engineering history across 30-plus global delivery locations.
DataArt tech stack and services
| Service area |
|---|
| Enterprise AI |
| Machine Learning |
| Data Engineering |
| MLOps |
DataArt pricing
Short answer: DataArt uses a dedicated team or retainer pricing approach. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed; a discovery call is required.
| Engagement model | Typical range | Best for |
|---|---|---|
| Dedicated team | Variable; depends on team size | Large programmes or team augmentation |
| Retainer | Monthly rate; not public | Ongoing AI engineering |
DataArt pros and cons
| Advantages | Things to consider |
|---|---|
| +Nearly three decades of software engineering history, among the longest reviewed here. | -AI sits inside a much broader software engineering practice rather than being the firm's core identity |
| +5,700-plus employees across 30-plus locations globally. | -Enterprise scale typically means slower onboarding than smaller, more agile AI boutiques |
| +Named industry focus areas (finance, healthcare, travel) show real vertical depth. | |
| +Data and analytics platform experience supports AI work that needs solid data foundations. |
DataArt vs alternatives
How DataArt compares to the other top AI Development firms.
| Company | Best for | Key difference | Rating | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlueLabel | Product teams that need AI wrapped in real... | A decade of product design discipline behind every LLM integration it ships | 4.8 | Full comparison |
| Markovate | Founders wanting an AI-only product partner. | AI-exclusive focus since 2015, predating the current generative AI surge | 4.6 | Full comparison |
| Tensorway | Teams that need compliance-certified AI delivery. | Compliance certification (GDPR, HIPAA, ISO 9001, ISO 27001) as standard, not an add-on | 4.5 | Full comparison |
| DataRoot Labs | Startups needing applied ML research on demand. | R&D-oriented engagement style built for startup pace, not enterprise procurement cycles | 4.4 | Full comparison |
| ITRex Group | Enterprises pairing AI with existing data infrastructure work. | Fifteen-plus years combining AI delivery with the data engineering it depends on | 4.3 | Full comparison |
| Valiance Solutions | Government agencies needing explainable decision-support AI. | One of the few AI vendors reviewed here with real government procurement experience | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| BotsCrew | SMBs wanting a dedicated conversational AI partner. | Nine years of conversational AI focus rather than a recently-added service line | 4.2 | Full comparison |
| EPAM Systems | Global enterprises running AI programs at massive scale. | Public-company scale (NYSE: EPAM) with financial transparency few competitors offer | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Grid Dynamics | Enterprises wanting a publicly-audited AI engineering partner. | Nasdaq listing (GDYN) with quarterly financial disclosure | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| LeewayHertz | Buyers wanting broad AI service coverage in one... | Backed by The Hackett Group's consulting network following its 2024 acquisition | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| InData Labs | Teams needing data science depth before an AI... | Data-science-first heritage that predates the generative AI branding wave | 4.1 | Full comparison |
| Master of Code Global | Enterprises standardizing conversational AI across channels. | Two decades focused specifically on enterprise conversational AI | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Softermii | Teams needing AI features inside a broader product... | Full-stack product development capability layered with newer AI service lines | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| SoftKraft | Startups on tight budgets needing data-driven MVPs. | Small dedicated team priced for startup budgets rather than enterprise rates | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| N-iX | Enterprises wanting AI paired with cloud and embedded... | 50-plus delivered AI projects with named enterprise clients like Bosch and Siemens | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Innowise Group | Buyers wanting one vendor across every AI service... | Full-cycle coverage of nearly every AI service category under one 2,000-plus person firm | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| 10Clouds | Product teams wanting AI folded into UX and... | AI treated as one integrated capability inside full product design and development | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Cleveroad | Startups needing AI features inside a mobile or... | Production-deployment discipline carried over from a decade of mobile and web delivery | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Accenture | Global enterprises running AI transformation across many business... | 60,000-plus trained generative AI practitioners inside a global consulting organization | 4.0 | Full comparison |
| Sigma Software Group | European enterprises wanting AI from a Nordic engineering... | Nordic headquarters and enterprise scale rare among the firms reviewed here | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Exadel | Enterprises wanting AI as part of a broader... | Over 25 years of enterprise technology consulting history predating most AI-focused competitors | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Simform | Enterprises pairing AI with a larger cloud engineering... | 1,400-plus engineers spanning six continents inside one accountable vendor | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| 10Pearls | Enterprises wanting AI bundled with digital transformation work. | Two decades of digital transformation delivery with AI as an established add-on practice | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Intellectsoft | Enterprises wanting AI alongside blockchain or IoT work. | Combines AI with blockchain and IoT engineering under one roof | 3.9 | Full comparison |
| Infosys | Global enterprises needing AI inside a full IT... | One of the world's largest IT services firms with a dedicated London-based consulting arm | 3.9 | Full comparison |
DataArt FAQ
What is DataArt?
New York software engineering firm founded in 1997
How much does DataArt charge?
DataArt uses dedicated team or retainer pricing. Minimum engagement is not publicly disclosed. A discovery call is required to get project-specific quotes.
What tech stack does DataArt use?
DataArt works with Python, AWS, Azure, Kubernetes, Apache Spark. Primary industries served include Financial services, Healthcare, Media & entertainment, Travel & hospitality.
Is DataArt right for enterprise?
Enterprises in finance or healthcare needing AI at global scale. 5,700+ team size. Key consideration: AI sits inside a much broader software engineering practice rather than being the firm's core identity.
What are the best DataArt alternatives?
The best alternatives to DataArt depend on your use case. Top options are:
- BlueLabel: a decade of product design discipline behind every llm integration it ships
- Markovate: ai-exclusive focus since 2015, predating the current generative ai surge
- Tensorway: compliance certification (gdpr, hipaa, iso 9001, iso 27001) as standard, not an add-on
Compare DataArt with other AI Development firms
Verify all details directly with DataArt before making a decision.